Under what circumstances can the governor remove a board member?

A board member can be removed by the governor under circumstances that involve incompetency or failure to perform their duties. This means that if a board member is not fulfilling their responsibilities, whether through a lack of knowledge, inability to contribute effectively to board meetings, or not engaging in necessary activities expected of their role, the governor has the authority to intervene.

This provision ensures that the integrity and functionality of the board are maintained, as ineffective members could hinder the board's ability to execute its duties effectively. The expectation is that board members will be competent and active participants in oversight and decision-making processes, and failure to meet these standards justifies removal to preserve the board's purpose and effectiveness.

Other choices, while they may be serious concerns regarding a board member's performance or ethics, do not specifically align with the stipulated grounds for removal in the context of incompetency and duty performance, which is why they are not the correct answer in this scenario.